High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/9026/2019disposed off

Vikrant Naidu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-11-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 9026 of 2019 • Vikrant Naidu S/o Shri Premchand Naidu Aged About 34 Years Food Inspector, Mungeli, R/o Gupta Gali, Mannu Chowk, Tikrapara, Police Station City Kotwali, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Department, Mantralaya, Police Station And Post Rakhi Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Director Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Department, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Collector Mungeli District Mungeli Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondents/State :

Shri Priyank Rathi, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 07/11/2019

1. Heard.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that earlier by order dated 30.07.2016, the petitioner was transferred from District Jashpur to District Mungeli and he took charge on 21.08.2017. Subsequently, by the impugned order dated 10.10.2019 again the petitioner has been transferred to Sukma.

3. It is contended that the petitioner has already rendered his services in the scheduled area for three years and now again he has been transferred to the scheduled area to accommodate others. It is further contended that the father

of the petitioner is bedridden as he is paralyzed and the petitioner has to look after him and the transfer has been made in the mid session and the children of the petitioner are studying at Bilaspur. Therefore, the transfer order may be canceled.

4. Perusal of the documents shows that the petitioner has already rendered service in the scheduled area and he was transferred to Mungeli in the year 2017. Considering the facts of this case, since the petitioner has again been transferred to the scheduled area, it is directed that the petitioner shall make afresh representation in this regard within a period of 15 days from today before the concerned respondent and the respondents in turn shall consider and decide the same in accordance with the transfer policy at the earliest preferably within a further period of 45 days. Till the representation of the petitioner is decided, the transfer of the petitioner, shall not be given effect to, if it has not been carried out till date.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu