Shri Suraj Ram Netam v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 9252 of 2019 • Shri Suraj Ram Netam S/o Thakur Ram Netam Aged About 61 Years Occupation - Service, Posted As Ranger, Zone Officer (Flying Squad) R/o Village Maukatola, Police Station Korar, Tahsil Kanker, Pin- 494670, Civil And Revenue District Kanker, Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Forest Department Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Capital Complex Nava Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Forest Officer Balod Forest Zone, District Balod, Chhattisgarh.
3. Deputy Forest Officer Balod Forest Zone, District Balod, Chhattisgarh.
4. Collector District Balod, Chhattisgarh.
5. Shri Moolchand Sharma S/o Shri Ratan Lal Sharma Aged About 53 Years Posted As Deputy Ranger, District Union Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents/ State :
Ms. Beenu Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 06/01/2020
1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner was in charge of the flying squad at Balod, Forest Division. The petitioner though is senior to Respondent No. 5 namely Shri Moolchand Sharma. Respondent No. 5 has been transferred by order dated 23.08.2019 and also given the charge of flying squad. It is contended that the petitioner being senior, the Respondent
No.5 cannot be given charge according to the circular of the State. It is not clear before this Court as to whether the petitioner has been removed and if the petitioner has been in the charge of flying squad, there is nothing on record to show that another person can not be given charge of flying squad. Further, there also is nothing on record to show that the charge from the petitioner has been taken away apart from the order of transfer dated 23.08.2019 and almost more than 4 months have been passed. Therefore, at this stage, I do not find any substantial issue to adjudicate as the petitioner or a government employee cannot claim the right to be posted at a particular post to discharge a particular job, it is the prerogative of the State to do so.
2. The petition has no merit, hence dismissed. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Jyoti