High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/3242/2018infructuous

Shivpal Bhagat v. Chief Election Officer Chhattisgarh

2018-11-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3231 of 2018 • Shivpal Bhagat, S/o Ramchandra Bhagat, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Sarasmal, Post Libra, Block Tamnar, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Chief Election Officer Chhattisgarh Shastri Chowk, Old Mantralaya Premises, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector/Chairman Media Pramanan Evam Nigrani Samiti, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

3. District Deputy Election Officer Collectorate Parisar, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

4. Superintendent Of Police Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

5. M/s Agrasen Offset Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent WPC No. 3242 of 2018 • Shivpal Bhagat S/o Ramchandra Bhagat, Aged About 31 Years R/o Sarasmal, Post Libra, Block Tamnar, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Chief Election Officer Chhattisgarh Shastri Chowk, Old Mantralaya, Premises, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector/chairman, Media Pramanan Evam Nigrani Samiti, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

3. District Deputy Election Officer, Collectorate Parisar, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

4. Superintendent Of Police, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh,

District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

5. M/s P.K.P. Publisher And Printer, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner Shri C. J. K. Rao, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri Shashank Thakur, GA Hon'ble Justice Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 28/11/2018 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that with the efflux of time, the writ petitions have been rendered infructuous. 2.

Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Nirala