← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/9282/2019disposed off

Bhupendra Singh Rajput v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-11-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 9282 of 2019 • Bhupendra Singh Rajput, S/o Shri Bhisham Singh, Aged About 32 Years, Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Government Primary School Sonpuri, Block Nawagarh, District Bemetra, Civil And Revenue District Bemetra, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Director Panchayat And Social Welfare Department, Indrawati Bhavan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Director School Education Department, Indrawati Bhavan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Bemetra, District Bemetra, Chhattisgarh.

5. The District Education Officer Bemetra, District Bemetra, Chhattisgarh.

6. The Block Education Officer Nawagarh, District Bemetra, Chhattisgarh.

7. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Nawagarh, District Bemetra, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For Respondents/ State :

Shri Soumya Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 14/11/2019

1. The limited grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner was suspended for the period from 2013 to 2015 and subsequently the suspension order

was revoked by order dated 19.10.2015 but the petitioner was not paid the dues which were payable to him during the suspension period. Therefore, in the earlier round of litigation direction was issued to decide the representation of the petitioner for payment of dues during the suspension period, thereafter, the order have been issued by Director Panchayat and CEO Janpad Panchayat to release the amount due to the petitioner for the suspension period as per Annexure P-7, however, the same is not been paid to the petitioner till date. Therefore, the petitioner has made a representation before Respondent No. 6 but the same is not been decided.

2. Perusal of Annexure P-7 shows that already order has been passed by the CEO Janpad Panchayat to release the dues of the petitioner by order dated 30.04.2019, but till date it has not been released. Therefore Respondent No. 6 & 7 are directed to release the dues of the petitioner according to order dated 30.04.2019 within 45 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

3. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Jyoti