← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/3336/2018disposed off

M/S Shri Shyam Food Products v. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited

2019-02-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3328 of 2018

1. M/s Shri Shyam Oil Extractions Pvt. Ltd. A Company Duly Incorporated Under The Provisions Of The Companies Act 1956, Having Its Office, At Banari, Tehsil Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, Through Its Director Shri Abhishek Agrawal (Sultania).

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Fire Tech Department, Head Office, Oriental House, A-25/27, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi- 110 002.

2. The Branch Manager Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Champa, Shanti- Nagar, Opp. Railway Station, Champa, Chhattisgarh-495671.

3. The Divisional Manager Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Bus Stand, Korba, Chhattisgarh.

4. Chief Regional Manager Oriental Insurance Company Limited, 1st Floor, R K Plaza, Panchpedi Naka, Ring Road, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent WPC No. 3336 of 2018

1. M/s Shri Shyam Food Products Having Its Office At Banari , tahsil Janjgir ,district Janjgir Champa Chhattisgrh through Its Proprietor Shri Abhishek Agrawal (Sultania ) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Fire Tech Department Head Office Orientel House A-25/27/Asaf Ali Road New Delhi 110002

2. The Branch Manager Oriental Insurance Company Limited Champa ,shanti Nagar Opp. Railway Station Champa Chhattisgarh 495617,

3. The Divisional Manager Oriental Insurance Company Limied Bus Stand Korba Chhattisgarh.

4. Chief Regional Manager Oriental Insurance Company Limiuted 1st Floor R.K. Plaza Panchpedi Naka Ring Road Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent For Petitioners Shri Ankit Singhal, Advocate For Respondent Shri Ratan Pusty, Advocate Order On Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.

04/02/2019

1. Petitioners' application for settlement of claim is pending consideration before the respondent Insurance company for last more than two years.

2. At this juncture, Shri Ratan Pusty, learned counsel appearing for the respondents would fairly submit that the Insurance Company shall consider and decide the pending issue and the grievance of the petitioner within a period of 8 weeks from today.

3. In view of the statement made, nothing survives in these petitions for adjudication. Let the respondents consider and decide the application of the petitioners within the time stated by them, in accordance with law and on its own merits.

4. Accordingly, both the writ petitions stand disposed of. Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Gowri