High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7760/2018disposed off

Dr Rashmi Sao v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-11-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7760 of 2018 Dr Rashmi Sao W/o Shri A. D. Sao Aged About 59 Years Posted As Professor At Government E. Raghvendra Rao P.G. Science College, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, R/o B 3-201, Ramkrishna Enclave, Sarkanda District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Addl. Chief Secretary Higher Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Under Secretary Higher Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Principal Government E. Raghvendra Rao P.G. Science College, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 29/11/2018

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 05.10.2018 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Government E. Raghvendra Rao P.G. Science College, Bilaspur to Government Naveen College, Manora, District Jashpur.

2. The petitioner submits that he has already made a detailed representation Annexure P/1 dated 17.11.2018 to the authority concerned seeking a request to the higher authority for canceling the order of transfer dated 05.10.2018, which till date has not been decided. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make an additional representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on her being transferred in addition to the representation

-2already made and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3. Not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if she so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved