Amar Singh Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 7782 of 2018 • Amar Singh Thakur S/o Late Shri Shukhlal Singh Thakur, Aged About 59 Years, Posted as Senior Assistant at Food Storage Centre, Pakhanjur, District Kanker, Chhattisgarh, R/o Beside Santoshi Jewelers, Santoshi Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department of Cooperative, Societies, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation 880, Civil Lines, Head Office, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation 880, Civil Lines, Head Office, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri V.R. Tiwari, Advocate For State :

Shri Majid Ali, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 28.11.2018 1.

The limited prayer which the petitioner made in the present writ petitioner is for a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner as far as the dues that would be payable to him during the suspension period and also for the consequential benefit of the revised pay scale and other benefits which the petitioner would have got had he not been placed under suspension. The petitioner has collectively made representations to the authorities which is Annexure-P/4.

2.

Given the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that no fruitful purpose would be served keeping the writ petiiton pending, rather ends of justice would meet, if the direction is given to respondents 2 and 3 to consider and decide the representation. That while deciding the representation, the respondents are required to decide as to how the period of suspension has to be treated keeping in view the judgment of acquittal that has been passed in favour of the petitioner and would also take a decision as to what benefits the petitioner would be entitled for on his being taken back in service after revocation of the suspension order, particularly in respect of the intervening period. Let this exercise be completed within a period of ninety days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge vatti