Tarshila Ekka v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 7806 of 2018 Tarshila Ekka D/o Late Shri Habil Ekka, Aged About 43 Years, Posted At District Education Office, Raigarh As Asstt. Director, Presently R/o Kotra Road, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Civil And Revenue District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Directorate Of Public Education, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

4. B. L. Koka S/o Shri G. D. Koka, Aged About 61 Years, Posted At District Education Office, Bilaspur As Asstt. Director, Presently R/o House No. 244, Ward No. 5, Gandhi Nagar Bilaspur District Bilaspur, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri D. Wankhede, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 29/11/2018 The present writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 06.10.2018 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from District Education Office, Raigarh to District Education Office, Bilaspur. 2.

The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that in place of petitioner, respondent no.4 has been ordered to be transferred but

respondent no.4 has filed a writ petition before this Court i.e. WPS No. 6893/2018. This Court while disposing of the said writ petition had granted an interim protection to respondent no.4 from being relieved from Bilaspur. According to the petitioner, since the case of respondent no.4 is already pending consideration before the authority concerned, meanwhile, the petitioner should not be relieved from the present place of posting otherwise that can create further complication. 3.

Given the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the interim protection granted in WPS No. 6893/2018 dated 12.10.2018, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would serve if the respondents are directed not to relieve the petitioner from the present place of posting i.e. Raigarh till the representation of respondent no.4 which is pending consideration before the State authorities is finally adjudicated. It is ordered accordingly.

4.

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Bhola