The Raipur Development Authority v. Rukhsana Begum
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Review Petition No. 1 of 2019 The Raipur Development Authority, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Applicant
Versus
1. Smt. Sunita Gurnani, W/o. Shri Ashok Gurnani, Aged about 53 years, R/o. Silver Estate, Kavita Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Housing and Environment, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Post & PS Mandir Hasaud, Raipur (Chhattisgarh).
---- Respondents Review Petition No. 2 of 2019 The Raipur Development Authority, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh).
---- Applicant
Versus
1. Rukhsana Begum W/o. Saeed Khan, Aged about 61 years, R/o. House No.A - 1407, Shanti Residency, Near Amrapali Society, Pachpedi Naka, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492001.
2. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Housing and Environment, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Post & PS Mandir Hasaud, Raipur (Chhattisgarh).
3. Assistant Revenue Officer, Raipur Development Authority, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents Review Petition No. 3 of 2019 The Raipur Development Authority, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh).
---- Applicant
Versus
1. Dilip Jain S/o Tarachand Jain Aged About 48 Years R/o Ramsagarpara, Raipur Chhattisgarh, Through Power Of Attorney Ganesh Prasad Agrawal, S/o Late Gulabrai Agrawal, Aged About 55 Years, R/o 29/514, Shriram Nagar, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Department of Housing and Environment, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Post & PS Mandir Hasaud, Raipur (Chhattisgarh).
---- Respondents
Review Petition No. 4 of 2019 The Raipur Development Authority, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh).
---- Applicant
Versus
1. Shikhar Amusement Pvt. Ltd. Having its registered address at Vandana Building, MG, Road Raipur, Chhattisgarh, through Director Shri Subhash Agrawal, S/o. Shri Niranjanlal Agrawal, R/o. Vandana Building, MG Road, Raipur, Tahsil and Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Civil and Revenue Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents Review Petition No. 145 of 2018 The Raipur Development Authority Through Its Chief Executive Officer, 2nd Floor Bhakt Matakarma Commercial Complex, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant
Versus
1. Shri Amon Kumar Clive S/o Shri T. Clive, Aged About 64 Years R/o Qr. No. G-01, District Hospital, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh.
2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Housing And Environment, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Post And PS Mandir Hasaud, Raipur Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents Review Petition No. 283 of 2018 The Raipur Development Authority Through Its Chief Executive Officer, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
1. Kamini Masih D/o Shri A.K.Clive Aged About 61 Years C/o Shri A.K.Clive, R/o Qr. No. G-01, District Hospital, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh.
2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Housing And Environment, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Post And P.S. Mandir Hasaud, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents.
For Applicants :
Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate For respondents :
Mr. Aman Kehsarwani, Advocate.
For State :
Mr. Vimlesh Bajpai, GA.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 18/01/2019 1.
Office objections are overruled.
2.
Having carefully gone through the review petitions, the order under challenge and the papers annexed therewith, I am satisfied that there is no error apparent on the face of the record, warranting reconsideration of the order under review.
3.
At this stage, Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that six months further time may be granted to comply with the order of this Court dated 13.10.2017 and subsequent orders. The said prayer is vehemently opposed by Mr. Aman Kehsarwani, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, stating that they have been deprived of possession of their suit property way back in the year 2010 and after a lapse of one year these review petitions have been filed which is groundless, therefore, further time be not granted to the applicants to comply the order(s) passed by this Court.
4.
Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, time upto 31.03.2019 is extended to comply with the order passed by this Court on 13.10.2017 and subsequent orders.
5.
The review petitions are accordingly dismissed with the above-stated observation/direction as contained in para-3 of this order. No cost(s). Sd /- (Sanjay K.Agrawal) Judge J/-