Rajshri Kshetrapal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 9200 of 2019 • Rajshri Kshetrapal, W/o Shri Bhivji Prasad, Aged About 38 Years, Working As Staff Nurse And Posted At C.H.C. Nikum District Durg Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary Department Of Health And Family Welfare , Mahanadi Bhawan , Mantralaya New Raipur , Atal Nagar District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Collector Durg , District Durg Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Medical And Health Officer Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents/ State :

Shri Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 14/11/2019

1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has been transfered from C.H.C. Nikum, District Durg to Community Health Centre Bande, District Kanker. However, the remark column says that it was voluntary. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has never made an application for transfer to any place and the remark column has been wrongly written that the petitioner has sought for transfer.

2. Considering the fact that disputed fact has been raised and the petitioner has not made any request for transfer and the transfer has been done on the ground that it was voluntary transfer. The petitioner is given liberty to make a fresh representation to Grievance Redressal Committee within 15

days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the representation so made, the same may be decided within a further period of 45 days.

3. In the meanwhile, the transfer order of the petitioner may not be given effect to if the petitioner has not been relieved.

4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Jyoti