High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/9225/2019disposed off

Mahendra Kumar Mahapatra v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-11-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 9225 of 2019 • Mahendra Kumar Mahapatra S/o Shri Bhikharicharan Mahapatra Aged About 63 Years Retired Pradhan Pathak R/o Village Basna Tahsil Basna District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, School Shiksha Vibhag Chhattisgarh Shashan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Sanchalak Lok Shikshan Sanchalnalay Chhattisgarh Indrawati Bhawan Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh,

3. District Education Officer, Karyalay Jila Shiksha Adhikari Mahasamund District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh

4. Block Education Officer, Basna, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh

5. Sambhagiya Sanyukt Sanchalak, Kosh Lekha Avm Pension Raipur Sambhag, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

6. Jila Koshalay Adhikari, Mahasamund, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Rajendra Kumar Patel, Advocate For Respondents/ State :

Ms. Binu Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 13/11/2019

1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has been retired on 28.02.2018, thereafter, all the documents and papers for payment of the pension and retiral dues are forwarded but the respondent is not taking any decision. Thereby, the interim pension which was to be paid to the petitioner has not been released.

2. It is contended that for the intermediate period for some interim pension was

paid, however, despite all correspondences has been made, the retiremental dues has not been made. It is further contended that the petitioner has made a representation before the Respondent No.4 to send all the necessary papers, however, the same is not decided.

3. This fact is also not disputed and all the documents would show that the petitioner is a retired employee. The Annexure-P1 is annexed herewith, which is the order for payment of pension and the retiral dues, which is unfortunate. Despite the petitioner has been retired as a teacher, his retiral dues are not supplied.

4. Though the petitioner has been retired in the year 2018, considering the plight of the petitioner, the respondents are directed to decide the entitlement of the retiral dues of the petitioner which include the payment of pension and shall release the same within a period of 45 days, from the date of receipt of this order.

5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Yasmin