← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/9662/2019disposed off

Rajesh Kumar Patre v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-11-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 9662 of 2019 Rajesh Kumar Patre S/o Shri Shalikram Patre Aged About 48 Years Panchayat Sachiv Gram Panchayat Senvar Jila Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Sachiv, Panchayat Gramin Vikas Vibhag, Mantralaya Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Mukhya Karyapalan Adhikari Karyalay Mukhya Karyapalan Adhikari Jila Panchayat Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Atirikt Mukhya Karyapalan Adhikari Jila Panchayat Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Anuvibhagiy Adhikari Rajsva Bilha, Jila Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

5. Mukhya Karyapalan Adhikari Janpad Panchayat, Bilha, Jila Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

6. Shailesh Kumar Dahire Panchayat Sachiv Janpad Panchayat Bilha, Jila Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

----Respondents For petitioner - Shri Rajendra Kumar Patel, Advocate. For State-Shri Priyank Rathi, PL.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 25/11/2019 1.

At the outset it appears that the order under challenge is passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Bilaspur. Since order are passed under the Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993, Chhattisgarh Panchayats (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1995 contemplate that in case order is passed by the Zila Panchayat appeal would lie under Rule 3 before the Commissioner. Consequently, there is alternative remedy is available, therefore this court is not inclined to entertain this petition. 2.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. The petitioner if so advised may avail the alternate remedy as available to him under the law. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) JUDGE gouri