← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/4071/2019disposed off

Ram Kumar Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-11-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4071 of 2019 Ram Kumar Yadav S/o Ramsatehi Yadav, R/o Netaji Chowk, Tahsil And District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

2. Chhattisgarh State Sahkari Vipran Sangh Maryadit Through Director, 880, Civil Lines, Head Office, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Harshwardhan Jaiswal, Advocate.

For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, G. A.

For Respondent No. 2 :

Shri Ashish Surana, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 21.11.2019

1. The limited grievance of the Petitioner in the present writ petition is that inspite of there being a specific order passed by this High Court in WPC No. 1928 of 2019 which was disposed of on 17.06.2019. The Respondent No. 2 till date has not given final decision on the claim/ representation that the Petitioner has made.

2. The Counsel for the Petitioner, at this juncture, submits that he has approached the authorities atleast seven times and submitted all relevant documents in respect of his claim, yet claim has not been finalized till date.

3. Given the aforesaid facts & circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping

-2the petition pending, rather ends of justice would meet if the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Managing Director of the Respondent No. 2 society to decide the claim of the petitioner at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days as this High Court had earlier itself in June, 2019 granted and had made a similar directions.

4. It is made clear that such directions of this High Court would be applicable only in the event, if the claim of the petitioner has till date not been decided by the Managing Director. In case, if it has been decided, the Petitioner would have the liberty to take appropriate recourse.

5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha