High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/3362/2018disposed off

Rewaram Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-12-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3361 of 2018 • Nitesh Sahu S/o Shivkumar Sahu Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Paraskol, Tahsil Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through, The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Tahsildar Arang District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Santosh Sahu S/o Baisakhu Sahu Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Paraskol, Police Station Arang, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent WPC No. 3362 of 2018 • Rewaram Sahu S/o Ganesh Sahu Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Paraskol, Tahsil Arang, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Tahsildar Arang, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Santosh Sahu S/o Baisakhu Sahu Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Paraskol, Police Station Arang, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent

For Petitioners Shri C. R. Sahu, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri Shashank Thakur, GA Hon'ble Justice Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 10/12/2018 1.

Petitioners have called in question the legality and the validity of the order passed by the Nayab Tehsildar, Arang, District Raipur under Section 248 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (for short the Code, 1959). The order is appealable under Section 44 of the Code, 1959, therefore, the petitioners should avail the alternative remedy instead of moving these petitions. 2.

The writ petitions are dismissed being not maintainable. Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Nirala