High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/9352/2019disposed off

Smt. Jacienta Toppo v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-11-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 9352 of 2019 • Smt. Jacienta Toppo, W/o. Shri Norbet Lakra Aged About 60 Years 10 Months Working As Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project Services, Project- Lailunga, District- Raigarh Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through- The Secretary, Woman And Child Development, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector, Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

3. District Program Officer Woman And Child Development, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate For Respondents/ State :

Shri Priyank Rathi, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 18/11/2019

1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has been transferred from Integrated Child Development Project, Lailunga, District Raigarh to Integrated Child Development Project, Mainpat, District Sarguja vide order dated 08.11.2019.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner contends that she has served for more than 10 years in the scheduled area and is left with only 14 months of service and at the fag end the petitioner may not be transferred to other scheduled area.

3. Perused the documents and considering the fact that the petitioner has

already served for more than 10 years in a scheduled area as pleaded in para 9.3 of the petition which is supported by a affidavit.

4. Considering the grievance raised by the petitioner and since the petitioner has again been transferred to scheduled area and she is left with only 14 months of service, the petitioner will be at liberty to make a representation to Grievance Redressal Committee within 15 days from today. The representation so made shall be decided within a further period of 60 days, if the transfer order of the petitioner has not been given effect to till date, the same may be stayed till the representation is decided.

5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Jyoti