Rashmi Rawat v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8298 of 2018

1. Rashmi Rawat D/o Shri Harishankar Rawat, Aged About 32 Years Occupation Guest Faculty (Zoology) Govt. Mahendra Karma Girls College Dantewada, District South Bastar Dantewada Chhattisgarh

2. Salama Lakra D/o Shri Harish Lakra, Aged About 29 Years Occupation Guest Faculty (Hindi) Govt. Mahendra Karma Girls College Dantewada, District South Bastar Dantewada Chhattisgarh

3. Digesh Kumar Gaydhane S/o Shri Shriram Gaydhane, Aged About 30 Years Occupation Guest Faculty (Geography) Govt. Mahendra Karma Girls College Dantewada, District South Bastar Dantewada Chhattisgarh

4. Rajesh Chauhan S/o Shri Mahendra Chaushan, Aged About 27 Years Occupation Guest Faculty (Political Science) Govt. Mahendra Karma Girls College Dantewada, District South Bastar Dantewada Chhattisgarh

5. Ajay Patel S/o Shri Shiv Kumar Patel Aged About 26 Years Occupation Guest Faculty (Botany) Govt. Mahendra Karma Girls College Dantewada, District South Bastar Dantewada Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Higher Education Ministry At Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur Police Station Rakhi District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner, Higher Education Directorate At Indrawati Bhawan New Raipur, Police Station Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Principal, Govt. Mahendra Karma Girls College, Dantewada, District South Bastar Dantewada Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For petitioners :

Shri Jai Prakash Shukla, Advocate.

For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 13/12/2018 1.

The challenge in the present writ petition is to the advertisement dated 24/07/2018 against the post of Guest Faculty. 2.

During the course of the argument, on a query being put to the counsel for the petitioners as to whether the advertisement has been acted upon or not, he fairly submits that the advertisement has in fact been acted upon and the petitioners had participated in the said advertisement and they have also been found selected at a different college and the place where the petitioners were seeking appointment has already been filled by some other selected candidates.

3.

Given the said fact that the appointments have been made from the advertisement under challenge, this Court is of the opinion that nothing further remains to be adjudicated upon in the present case as of now. Reserving the right of the petitioners to raise their dispute in respect of any monetary claim against the respondents by way of separate proceeding, the present writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Bhola