Kusumlata Bhagat v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8275 of 2018

1. Kusumlata Bhagat D/o Shri Lakhan Sai Bhagat, Aged About 24 Years Occupation Guest Faculty (Zoology), Government College, Premnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh

2. Ganga Ram Sahu S/o Shri Kashi Lal Sahu, Aged About 29 Years Occupation - Guest Faculty (English), Government College, Premnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh

3. Ranjana Dixit D/o Shri Satishankar Dixit, Aged About 29 Years Occupation - Guest Faculty (Hindi), Government College, Premnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh

4. Pravin Kumar Kujur S/o Shri Naresh Kujur, Aged About 31 Years Occupation - Guest Faculty (Economics) Government College, Premnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh

5. Parwati Rajwade D/o Shri Nandlal Rajwade, Aged About 27 Years Occupation - Guest Faculty (Chemistry), Government College, Premnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Ministry At Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, P.S. Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner, Higher Education, Directorate At Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, P.S. Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Principal, Government College, Premnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For petitioners :

Shri Jai Prakash Shukla, Advocate.

For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board

13/12/2018 1.

The challenge in the present writ petition is to the advertisement dated 22/06/2018 against the post of Guest Faculty. 2.

During the course of the argument, on a query being put to the counsel for the petitioners as to whether the advertisement has been acted upon or not, he fairly submits that the advertisement has in fact been acted upon and the petitioners had participated in the said advertisement and they have also been found selected at a different college and the place where the petitioners were seeking appointment has already been filled by some other selected candidates.

3.

Given the said fact that the appointments have been made from the advertisement under challenge, this Court is of the opinion that nothing further remains to be adjudicated upon in the present case as of now. Reserving the right of the petitioners to raise their dispute in respect of any monetary claim against the respondents by way of separate proceeding, the present writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Bhola