Mayaram Sarfe v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 10165 of 2019 1.

Mayaram Sarfe S/o Mr. Bajjoo Ram Sarfe Aged About 50 Years By Occupation Teacher (Local Body) Posted At Govt. Upper Primary School Nijhar, Block Antagarh Distt. U.B. Kanker Chhattisgarh 2.

Rajau Ram Dhruw S/o Mr. Dharam Singh Dhruw Aged About 45 Years By Occupation Teacher (Local Body) Posted At Govt Upper Primary School Niljhar, Block Antagarh Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh 3.

Laxman Ram Markam S/o Mr. Heera Lal Markam Aged About 46 Years By Occupation Teacher (Local Body) Posted At Govt. Upper Primary School , Matla A, Block Antagarh Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh 4.

Manu Ram Mandavi S/o Mr. Sukalu Ram Mandavi Aged About 41 Years By Occupation Teacher (Local Body), Posted At Govt. Upper Primary School Nagarbeda Block Antagarh Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2.

The Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3.

District Education Officer, District - U.B. Kanker, Chhattisgarh 4.

Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Antagarh, District : U.B. Kanker, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Ms. Akanksha Jain, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 05/12/2019

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in WPS No.5794 of 2019, therefore, the same order may be passed in the present writ petition also.

3. This Court in WPS No.5794 of 2019 on 06.08.2019 has passed the following order:- "1.Challenge in this petition is that though the petitioners were initially appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III and have subsequently been absorbed to the Education Department, they have by now completed 10 years of service and therefore they are entitled for the benefit of Karmonnati as per rules governing the field, however, the respondents till date have not granted the said benefit to the petitioners.

2.Given the limited grievance which the petitioners have raised, let the petitioners make a suitable representation to the respondents No.3 & 4 within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the respondents No.3 & 4, in turn, shall take a decision on the granting of Kramonnati to the petitioners within a further period of 90 days.

3.The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.

4. Learned State counsel has no objection.

5. It is ordered accordingly. The ratio laid down in the case supra shall also govern the cause of lis in this case and will have the same effect and operation.

6. With such observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge yasmin