Hitesh Kumar Bhoi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8077 of 2018

1. Hitesh Kumar Bhoi S/o Shri Manbhajan Bhoi Aged About 30 Years Occupation- Guest Faculty (Inglish), Government College, Baloda, DistrictMahasamund, Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh

2. Ritesh Kumar Dev S/o Shri Upendra Dev Aged About 31 Years Occupation Guest Faculty (Commerce), Government College, Baloda, DisttrictMahasamund, Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh

3. Madhuri Pradhan D/o Shri Kailash Pradhan Aged About 29 Years Occupation Guest Faculty (Political Science), Government College, Baloda, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh

4. Bhojkumari Nayak D/o Shri Purushottam Nayak Aged About 23 Years Occupation- Guest Faculty (Zoology), Government College, Baloda, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Deparment Of Higher Education, Ministry At Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, P.S. Rakhi, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner Higher Education, Directorate At Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, P.S. Rakhi, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Principal Government College, Baloda, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For petitioner :

Shri Jai Prakash Shukla, Advocate.

For State :

Shri S. P. Kale, Dy. AG Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 07/12/2018 1.

The challenge in the present writ petition is to the advertisement dated 25/06/2018 against the post of Guest Faculty. During the course of the arguments counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that as to whether the advertisement has since been acted upon. He further submits that the advertisement has infact been acted upon and the petitioner also had participated in the said advertisement and he has also been found selected at a different college and the place where the petitioner was seeking appointment have already been filed by some other selected candidate.

2.

Given the said facts of the appointment have been made from the advertisement under challenge, this Court is of the opinion that nothing further remains to be adjudicated upon in the present case as of now. Reserving the right of the petitioners to raise their dispute in respect of any monetary claims against the respondent by way of separate proceeding, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Rohit JUDGE