Rajuranjan Kumar v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 9764 of 2018 Rajuranjan Kumar S/o Lallan Mahato Aged About 24 Years R/o Fakumaholla, Jyoti Nagar, Post- Deepika, Thana- Deepika, Korba, Chhattisgarh. Mentioned Present Address., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh .
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station- Arjunda, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For the Applicant :
Shri Anshul Singhaniya, Advocate For the State :
Shri Ashutosh Pandey, Panel Lawyer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board /02/2019
1. This is the first bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC and there is no bail application is pending before any other Court.
2. Perused the case diary provided by the learned counsel for the State in connection with the Crime No.60/2018 registered at Police Station Arjunda, District Balod (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 363, 366/376 of IPC read with Section 4, 5 (L)/6 of POCSO Act.
3. Case of the prosecution, in brief is that on 20/06/2018 prosecutrix was more than 17 years old. She is resident of village Parastarai. On 20/06/2018 he took her, in Bajrang Temple at village Kamroud. He put vermilion on her forehead. He committed sexual intercourse with her. On 20/07/2018 he again took her and committed repeatedly sexual intercourse with her.
4. As per the true copy of the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 of CrPC she had stated that applicant had not taken her anywhere he had not committed any act with her.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case, therefore, he shall be released on bail.
6. On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application. He
further submits that no criminal antecedents against the applicant.
7. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, looking to the fact that there is no likelihood of the accused to abscond and tamper the evidence, it is directed that if the applicant furnishes one solvent surety for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- along with a personal bond in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court with the condition that he shall appear before the trial Court at 11.00 am as and when directed till trial and he would cooperate during the trial, he shall be released on bail.
8. Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Kamde