Saroj Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 9914 of 2019 • Saroj Yadav W/o Shri Gurunarayan Yadav Aged About 41 Years R/o Mig-3, Moti Nagar, Boriyakhurd, Raipur Police Station Tikrapara, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Police Station And Post Rakhi, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Director Directorate Of Public Education, Indravati Bhavan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh

4. District Education Officer Balod District Balod Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer Block Patan, District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri S.K. Pandey, Advocate For Respondents/State :

Ms. Binu Sharma, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 29/11/2019

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been transferred from Mahuda Middle School, Patan, District Durg to Government Middle School, Jatadaah, Block Daundilohara, Distt. Balod. He would further submit that the petitioner is residing at Raipur and the place of posting is 15 km

away and the husband of the petitioner is also working at Raipur, therefore, as per the transfer policy of the State the husband & wife are to be kept in the same place. He would further submit that the several letters and representations are filed before the different authorities, however, the same is not bee decided, therefore, transfer being made in the mid session which is against the transfer policy, the same may be canceled.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the documents.

4. There is nothing on record to show that the husband of the petitioner is posted at Raipur and the children are studying at Raipur and it is only on the basis of the averments made in the representation, the submission has been made. However, taking into the language of the representation, the petitioner is given liberty to make a representation in this regard before the grievance redressal committee within a period of 15 days and the committee in turn shall decide the same within a further period of 45 days from the date of receipt of the representation.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu