← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/8202/2018disposed off

Ms Shubhada Rahalkar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-12-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8202 of 2018 Ms Shubhada Rahalkar D/o G.K. Rahalkar Aged About 55 Years R/o Flat 102 Chandra Park, Near Brahaspati Bazar, Bilaspur Distirct - Bilaspur - 495001., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Director Department Of Higher Education, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Principal Government Bilasa Girls Collage, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. The Collector District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For petitioner :

Ms. Shivali Dubey, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Dhiraj Wankhede,G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 11/12/2018 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is physically handicapped to the extent of 50%, which would be evident from Annexure P-2, which shows that the petitioner is suffering from osteoarthritis. He further submits that the petitioner has been transferred from Government Bilasa Girls Degree College, Bilasput to Government Navin College, Jhalmala, District Kabirdham, the transfer order so effected in respect of the petitioner may be stayed. 2.

Perused the documents connected to this petition. Annexure P-2 shows that the petitioner is suffering 50% physical disability issued by the competent authority. In view of this, without any observation on merits, it is directed that the petitioner shall be at liberty to make a representation with the aforesaid document

so that her case may be considered by the competent authority on the humanitarian ground with sympathy.

3. It is observed that the petitioner shall be at liberty to make such representation within a period of two weeks, which may be decided within a further period of 60 days by the competent authority. Till the decision is arrived at, the transfer order dated 05.10.2018 in respect of the petitioner may not be given effect to.

4. With such observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Rohit JUDGE