Neelkanth Choubey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 8220 of 2018 Neelkanth Choubey S/o Ramkripal Choubey, Aged About 36 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.), At Govt. Higher Secondary School Matiya, Block Kasdol, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Govind Dewangan, Advocate For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 12.12.2018 Heard on admission.

1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is working as Shiksha Karmi Grade-I since 2009, neither he has been given Kramonnati nor has he been given Samayman Vetanman (time bound pay scale) and therefore, he may be permitted to file representation before the competent authority for redressal of his

grievances. To this, counsel for the State has no objection. 2.

Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. In the eventuality of making any representation by the petitioner highlighting his grievances, the same is expected to be decided by the authority concerned expeditiously in accordance with law.

4.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation in accordance with law.

Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai