Santosh Kumar Suryavanshi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP(S) No.10048 of 2019 • Santosh Kumar Suryavanshi S/o Mahettar Ram Suryavanshi Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Bitkula, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2.

Director, Directorate, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3.

Deputy Director , Sthaniya Nidhi, Sampariksha Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4.

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Masturi, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6.

Block Education Officer, Janpad Panchayat Masturi, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Basant Kaiwartya, Advocate For Respondent/ State :

Mr. Soumya Rai, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 09/12/2019 1.

The limited grievance of the petitioner is that he is entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which he has completed, but he has not been given the same till date. 2.

Given the limited grievance raised, let the petitioner makes detailed representation in this regard to the Respondents 5 & 6 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance

with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioner. 3.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge yasmin