Golu @ Gubendra Masih v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 9824 of 2018 • Golu Gubendra Masih S/o Jugnu Masih, aged about 35 years, R/o Village Ganeshpur, Police Station Simga, District Baloda BazarBhatapara (C.G.) ---- Applicant

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police StationSimga, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) ---- Respondent __________________________________________________________________ For Applicant : Mr. Samir Singh, Advocate.

For Respondent/State : Mr. Amit Singh, PL.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel Order On Board 28/02/2019

1. The applicant has preferred this first bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail as he is arrested in connection with crime No. 385/2018, registered at Police Station - Simga, District- Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 4, 5, 6, & 10 of the CG Krishak Pashu Parirakshan Adhiniyam and Section 429 of the IPC.

2. As per prosecution story, on 04.11.2018, a secret information received from an informant to the police officials that near the house of Sant Masih, the applicant selling the beef of a calf. On the basis of said information, police officials reached the spot and seized head, skin and other body parts of the calf and also one axe has also been seized from his possession. On the basis of said, offence has been registered and he has been taken in custody on 05.11.2018.

3. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant submits that the Applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. He

further submits that the applicant is in custody since 05.11.2018 and trial will take some time. Therefore, he may be released on bail.

4. Per contra, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the bail application.

5. I have heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the case diary with due care.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the evidence collected by the prosecution and further considering the fact that the applicant is in custody since 05.11.2018 and trial will likely to take some time, without further commenting on merits of the case, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail.

7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

8. It is directed that the Applicant shall be released on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court for his appearance before the said Court as and when directed.

Sd/- (Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge Shubham