High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/8401/2018disposed off

Raviprabha Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-01-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 8363 of 2018 Ashok Kumar Sahu S/o Ram Singh Sahu, Aged About 40 Years, Working As Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Government Middle School Kosamkunda, Block Bilaigarh, District - Baloda BazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, State Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer, Baloda Bazar, District - Baloda BazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Baloda Bazar, District - Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer, Block Bilaigarh, District - Baloda BazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents Writ Petition (S) No. 8401 of 2018 Raviprabha Sahu S/o Ram Singh Sahu, Aged About 38 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Government Primary School Junvani, Block Bilaigarh, District - Baloda BazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, State Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer, Baloda Bazar, District - Baloda BazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Bilaigarh, District - Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer, Block Bilaigarh, District - Baloda BazarBhatapara Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For petitioners :

Shri Uday Pratap Singh Sahu, Advocate.

For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 02/01/2019

1. Since the facts and the relief sought for in both the petitions are common, both these petitions are being disposed of by this common order.

2. The limited grievance of the petitioners is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.

3. Given the limited grievance raised, let both the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.

4. With the aforesaid observation, both the writ petitions stand disposed of.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Khatai