High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/9801/2019withdrawn

Doluram Baghel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-06-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 9801 of 2019

1. Doluram Baghel S/o Shjri Vishwanath Baghel Aged About 42 Years Batch No. R-31, Posted As Constable At DRG, Naxal Operation Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh.

2. Churaman Nayak S/o Shri Ram Khilawan Nayak Aged About 34 Years Batch No. R-703, Posted As Constable At Drg, Naxal Operation Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh

3. Dhan Sai Kashyap S/o Shri Somaruram Kashyap Aged About 35 Years Batch No. R-558, Posted As Constable At DRG, Naxal Operation Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh

4. Kanshlal Kemro S/o Shri Dayaram Kemro Aged About 34 Years Batch No. R-1174, Posted As Constable At DRG, Naxal Operation Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh.

5. Mangal Sai Kashyap S/o Shri Sukaru Kashyap Aged About 41 Years Batch No. R-575, Posted As Constable At DRG, Naxal Operation Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh

6. Mahangu Kashyap S/o Shri Ramuram Kashyap Aged About 25 Years Batch No. R-1322, Posted As Constable At DRG, Naxal Operation Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Director General Of Police District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Additioanl Director General Naxal Operation, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Inspector General Of Police Police Range, Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh

5. Superintendent Of Police Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh.,

6. Deputy Superintendent Of Police (DRG) Naxal Operation, District Bastar Chhattisgarh

7. Station House Officer Police Station Nagarnar, District Bastar Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents

03/06/2020 Mr. Kishore Narayan, Counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy. A.G. for the respondents/ State.

Heard on I.A. No. 02, application for withdrawal of the writ petition.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the subsequent promotion order passed by the respondent authorities on 27.03.2020, the instant writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, he prays to withdraw this writ petition. In view of his submission made, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

However, the petitioners are at liberty to file an appropriate fresh petition for the new cause of action.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Vishakha