← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/8430/2018disposed off

Vikram Singh Sidar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-12-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8430 of 2018 Vikram Singh Sidar S/o Late Shri Manohar Lal Sidar Aged About 29 Years Posted As Didtrict Employment And Self Employment Guidance Centers Raigarh As Assistant Grade Iii ,presently R/o Room No. 58/ews Dindyal Colony Tv Tower Road Raigarh District Raigarh ,civil And Revenue District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Skill Development Technical Education And Employment Department Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Directorate Of Employment And Trainning Public Education Indrawati Bhawan Block 4, First Floor Nagar Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Emploument And Self Employment Guidence Centers Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

4. District Employment Officer Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

5. Laxmi Narayan Baghel S/o Sudha Ram Aged About 40 Years Posted As Assistant Grade Iii At District Employment And Self Employment Guidence Centers Raigarh,district Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For petitioner :

Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Dhiraj Wankhede,GA Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 14/12/2018 1.

The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure- P-1 dated 28/09/2018 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from the Jila Rojgar and Swarojgar Margdarshan Kendra, Raigarh to Jila Rojgar and Swarojgar Margdarshan Kendra, Jashpur.

2.

Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3.

Not opposed.

4.

Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents. Considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Rohit JUDGE