Brijesh Masih v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8531 of 2018 Brijesh Masih S/o Late Shri Mailan Masih Aged About 50 Years R/o Jarhabhata, Bandhiyapara, Ward No. 9, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. District Education Officer Office Of District Education Officer, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
3. Board Of Secondary Education And Teachers Training M.P.C.N.I. Through Its Secretary Board Of Secondary Education And Teachers Training, Motibag, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
4. Burgess Memorial Girls Higher Secondary School (Government Aided School), Through Its Principal, Burgess Memorial Girls Higher Secondary School, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
5. Mission Higher Secondary School (Government Aided School) Through Its Principal Mission Higher Secondary School Mission Higher Secondary School, Brihaspati Bazar, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
6. Lav Singh Thakur S/o Shri Dashrath Singh Thakur Working As Lab Attendant At Mission Higher Secondary School, Brihaspati Bazar, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For petitioner :
Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate.
For State :
Ms. Sunita Jain, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 07/01/2019
1. The limited grievance which the petitioner has sought for in the present writ petition is for a direction to respondents No. 2, 3 & 4 for taking the decision on the pending representation which the petitioner has filed before them as early as possible on 02.11.2018.
2. Given the limited facts and considering the nature of dispute raised, this Court without entering the merits of the case so far as the entitlement is concerned disposes off the present writ petition with a direction to respondents No. 2, 3 & 4
to take a decision at the earliest preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
3. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Rohit JUDGE