← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/9920/2018disposed off

Monu Dubey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-01-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 9920 of 2018 Monu Dubey S/o Bhairavnath Dubey Aged About 24 Years R/o Sahebram Colony, T. V. Tower Road, Near Medical College, Raigarh P. S. Chakradhar Nagar, Tehsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Chakradhar Nagar, Tehsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For the Applicant :

Shri Krishna Tandan, Advocate For the State :

Shri Sumit Jhawar, Panel Lawyer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board /01/2019

1. This is the first bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC and there is no bail application is pending before any other Court.

2. Perused the case diary provided by the learned counsel for the State in connection with the Crime No.293/2018 registered at Police Station Chakradhar Nagar, District Raigarh (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 392 of IPC.

3. Case of the prosecution, in brief is that on 11/08/2018 complainants Smt. Manju Mourya and her sister Smt. Rubi Kushwaha at about 6.30 to 7 p.m. were returning back from Raigarh Bazar after marketing. Near the DFO Bungalow one unknown person reached there by TVS Moped snatched one carry bag from complainant Smt. Manju Mourya. Purse of complainant Smt. Manju Mourya and Smt. Rubi Kushwaha were kept in that carry bag. Some cash, ATM Card, PAN Card, Aadhar Card, one mobile were kept in the purse of complainant Smt. Rubi Kushwaha. On the memorandum of applicant one ladies purse, one carry bag, one Moped, one another ladies purse, ATM Card, PAN Card, Aadhar Card were seized from the possession of the applicant.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he has innocent and falsely implicated in the present case, therefore, he shall be released on bail.

5. On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application. He further submits that no criminal antecedents against the applicant.

6. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case,looking to the fact that there is no likelihood of the accused to abscond and tamper the evidence, it is directed that if the applicant furnishes two solvent sureties for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- each along with a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- to the satisfaction of the concerned Court with the condition that he shall not involved such type of crime in future, he shall be released on bail.

7. Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Kamde