Umesh Kumar Bhagat v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 8462 of 2018

1. Umesh Kumar Bhagat S/o Chandan Ram, Aged About 32 Years, Working As Water Carrier, Govt. 50 Seater Scheduled Tribe PreMetric Boys Hostel, Farsabahar, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

2. Sunder Ram Bhagat S/o Jageshwar, Aged About 31 Years, Working As Chowkidar, Tribal Boys Hostel, Farsabahar, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh

3. Shivshankar Sai S/o Ahalu Sai, Aged About 34 Years, Working As Water Carrier, Govt. Pre-Metric Tribal Boys Hostel, Dumariya, BlockFarsabahar, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

4. Pradeep Kumar Patar S/o Shri Salikram Ram Patar, Aged About 42 Years, Working As Water Carrier, Pre-Metric Tribal Boys Hostel, Dumariya, Block -Farsabahar, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

5. Krishna Kumar Rajak S/o Deelaram Rajak, Aged About 45 Years, Working As Peon, Tribal Pre- Metric Boys Hostel, Mendar Bahar, Block- Farshabahar, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

6. Chhagan Sai S/o Kaleshwar Sai, Aged About 30 Years, Working As Peon, Govt. Pre- Metric Tribal Boys Hostel, Mendar Bahar, BlockFarsabahar, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

7. Smt. Prabha Bada (Kalra) W/o Anil Lakra, Aged About 32 Years Working As Peon, Tribal Girls Asharam, Bangaon, Block-Farsabahar, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, P.S. Rakhi, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Commissioner, Department Of Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development Chhattisgarh, Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. The Collector (Scheduled Tribe Welfare Branch) District- Jaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, District- Jaspur , Chhattisgarh

5. The Block Education Officer, Farsabahar, District- Jaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri K. P. Sahu, Advocate For State :

Shri Jitendra Pali, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 03/01/2019 Heard.

1.

At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not want to press any other relief and confine their prayer to the extent that the respondents may be directed to scrutinize the case of the petitioners individually in accordance with the instructions issued vide memo dated 7.3.2012. 2.

Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the case of all the petitioners will be scrutinized in accordance with the prevailing circular dated 7.3.2012 and if they are found fit, appropriate orders thereafter, for their continuation of services, will be passed in accordance with law. 3.

In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for the State, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition.

4.

Accordingly, the petition stands disposed off. No order as to costs. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Khatai