Budhdev Ram Chouhan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 8469 OF 2018

1. Budhdev Ram Chouhan S/o Anandram, Aged About 43 Years Working As Cook, Govt. Pre-Metric Boys Hostel, Kunjara, Block Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

2. Dilip Singh S/o Umanath Singh, Aged About 31 Years Working As Chowkidar, Pre-Metric Boys Hostel, Kunjara, Block- Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

3. Rajeev Ram Bhagat S/o Bhaneshwar Ram, Aged About 30 Years Working As Cook, Pre-Metric Boys Hostel, Keradih, Block Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, P.S. Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Commissioner, Department Of Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe Development Chhattisgarh, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Collector (Scheduled Tribe Welfare Branch), District Jashpur Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

4. The Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare Department, Jashpur, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

5. The Block Education Officer, Kunkuri, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh, District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Shri K. P. Sahu, Advocate.

For Respondent-State : Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 04.01.2019 Heard.

1.

At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that the petitioners do not want to press any other relief and confine their prayer to the extent that the respondents may be directed to

scrutinize the case of the petitioners individually in accordance with the instructions issued vide memo dated 07.03.2012. 2.

Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the case of all the petitioners will be scrutinized in accordance with the prevailing circulars dated 07.03.2012 and if they are found fit, appropriate orders thereafter, for their continuation of services, will be passed in accordance with law. 3.

In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for the State, according to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, nothing survives in this petition.

4.

Accordingly, the petition stands disposed off. No order as to costs. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Priyanka