← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/9885/2019disposed off

Dinesh Kumar Dharmik v. Bank Of India

2020-01-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 9885 of 2019 Dinesh Kumar Dharmik S/o Shri Shobharam Aged About 49 Years Occupation Service Officer Scale-1, Under The Office of Bank of India, Durg, Branch Durg, Police Station City Kotwali Durg, Revenue and Civil District Durg, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner

Versus

1. Bank of India through its Chairman and Managing Director, Head Office Star House, C-5, G-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Police Station Bandra East Mumbai, Maharastra., District : Mumbai, Maharashtra

2. The General Manager (Personal Department) Bank of India, Head Office Star House, C-5, G-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Police Station Bandra East, Mumbai, Maharastra., District : Mumbai, Maharashtra

3. Zonal Manager Bank of India, Zonal Office, 1st Floor, G.D. Shesh Nilayam, Tatyapara, Raipur - 492001, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondents For the Petitioner : Mr. Prakash Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Anand Shukla, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order on Board -01-2020

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was entitled to be considered for promotion to the next higher post carrying the Scale VI to VII and despite the fact that he is under the zone of consideration since the year 2009 in view of Circular of Government of India dated 14th March, 2012 itself and though much time has elapsed since 2009, the case of the petitioner has not yet been considered. He submits that the petitioner has filed representation dated 28.11.2018 (Annexure P-4) before respondent No.2, however, the same still remains undecided. He prays that for the time being, the said representation may be directed to be decided forthwith.

2. Considering the limited prayer of the petitioner, the petitioner is given liberty

to make a fresh representation to respondent No.3 who in turn shall forward it to the concerned superior authority of the Bank within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of this order and on such representation being filed, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same within a further period of 90 days. The petitioner shall also be at liberty to furnish necessary Circular along-with the representation and make relevant pleading therein in support of his case.

3. With the above observation/direction, this writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE R a o