High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/9915/2019disposed off

Yogendra Kumar Sinha v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-11-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 9915 of 2019 • Yogendra Kumar Sinha S/o Shri Vishnu Kumar Sinha Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Naimed, Tahsil Bijapur, District Bijapur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Agricultural Development And Farmer Welfare And Bio-Technology , Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan , Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Director Agriculture Directorate , Agriculture Department , Vikas Bhawan Atal Nagar , Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Deputy Director Agriculture , Bijapur , District Bijapur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Punit Ruparel, Advocate For Respondents/State :

Ms. Binu Sharma, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 29/11/2019

1. The present petition has been filed for issuance of a direction to respondenttransferring authority to relieve the petitioner on the grievance that though the transfer order has been issued by the State Government, till date, the petitioner has not been relieved.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that though the petitioner was transferred vide order dated 23.08.2019, however till date has not been relieved for joining at the transferred place.

3. The issue regarding implementation of transfer order has been considered by

this Court in the case of Ms. Manisha Agrawal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others, 2015(4) C.G.L.J.182, wherein relying upon several judgments of the Supreme Court, it has been held by this Court that once the employee has been transferred, it is required to be complied with unless it is modified, varied or cancelled by the State Government itself.

4. Therefore, in these circumstances, this petition is disposed of with a direction that the petitioner shall be relieved forthwith by the controlling authority in compliance of the transfer order unless the State has not modified, amended or cancelled the said order so far as petitioner is concerned. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu