← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/7715/2019allowed

Jibrail @ Xavier Kujur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-01-20Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 7715 of 2019 • Jibrail @ Xavier Kujur S/o Milianus Kujur, aged about 36 years, R/o Jhapra, Kuliadamar Para, P.S. Balrampur, District Balrampur - Ramanujganj (C.G.) ---- Applicant

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh Through : Police Station - Balrampur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ---- Respondent For Applicant :

Shri Pushkar Sinha, Advocate For Respondent :

Shri B.L. Sahu, P.L.

Hon'ble Smt Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 20/01/2020 1.

The applicant has preferred this first bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail as he is arrested in connection with Crime No.162/2019, registered at Police Station - Balrampur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 376 IPC.

2.

The allegation against the applicant is that on 01.08.2019, he committed forcible sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix, who was working in his house. Based on this, offence has been registered. The present applicant has been taken into custody on 03.08.2019.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that there is dispute between him and the husband of the prosecutrix, therefore, he has been roped in this case. He also submits that the prosecutrix is major and medical report does not support the case of prosecution. He

next submits that the applicant is in custody since 03.08.2019, charge sheet has been filed and there is no likelihood of his case being decided in near future. Therefore, he may be released on bail.

4.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposed the bail application. Learned State counsel submits that the age of the prosecutrix is about 40 years.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

6.

Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, quality of evidence and further considering the fact that the applicant is in custody since 03.08.2019, charge sheet has been filed and the trial is likely to take some time, without further commenting on merits of the case, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail.

7.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8.

It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before the said Court as and when directed.

Certified copy, as per rules.

Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge Pekde