Sanjay Kumar Sidar v. The State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 9945 of 2019 • Sanjay Kumar Sidar, S/o Shri Bhagwano Sidar, Aged About 37 Years, Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Government Primary School Kalakhunta, Block Baramkela, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. The Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. The District Panchayat Raigarh Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
4. The Janpad Panchayat, Baramkela, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Baramkela, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri Roop Naik, Advocate For Respondents/ State :
Ms. Binu Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 29/11/2019 Heard.
1. The limited relief sought for by the petitioner in this petition is for an appropriate direction to the respondents for releasing the arrears of pay which the petitioner is entitled for on account of revision of pay granted to the petitioner.
2. According to counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner was entitled for an amount of Rs.56,348/- as arrears of pay which till date has not been
released. The petitioner has been approaching the authorities in the department, but till date no steps have been taken by the authorities concerned.
3. Given the said facts and circumstances of the case, this court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents No.2 to 4 to take appropriate decision so far as arrears of pay that the petitioner is entitled for on account of revision of pay that is taken place, at the earliest, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
4. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to apprise the respondents No.2 to 4 so far as order passed by this court is concerned.
5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Jyoti