Ved Prakash Kashyap v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 60 of 2019 • Ved Prakash Kashyap S/o Bhagat Ram Kashyap Aged About 30 Years, Up-Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Jarhagaon, Janpad Panchayat, Mungeli, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector Mungeli, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgrah

3. The Sub-Divisional OfÏcer (Revenue), Mungeli, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

4. The Chief Executive OfÏcer Janpad Panchayat, Mungeli, DistrictMungeli, Chhattisgarh

5. Smt. Satyawati Sahu W/o Ramchand Sahu Aged About 40 Years Ramchand Sahu, Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Jarhagaon, Janpad Panchayat, Mungeli, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

6. Narmada Singh Rajput S/o Ghanshyam Singh Rajput Aged About 35 Years Posted As Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Jarhagaon, Janpad Panchayat, Mungeli, Disrtict- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioner Ms. Sofia Khan, Advocate For Respondent/State Mr. Rajesh Singh, Dy. GA Order On Board By Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra 9/1/2019

1. Heard.

2. To assail the order dated 31.3.2018-Annexure P/1 passed by the

SDO(R), Mungeli, the petitioner has preferred an appeal before the Collector, Mungeli vide Annexure P/2A, which is pending consideration.

3. In view of the pendency of the appeal before the Collector, this Court would not proceed to entertain the writ petition instead the same is disposed of with direction to the Collector, Mungeli to hear and decide the petitioner's appeal by a speaking order, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 2 months from today. Sd/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge Shyna