Rajesh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 10030 of 2019 • Rajesh Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Kodanddhar Sahu Aged About 38 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Manikpur Chhote, Block- Baramkela, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department of Panchayat And Rural Development Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. The Commissioner Cum Director, Directorate of Panchayat, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. The District Panchayat, Raigarh, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
4. The Janpad Panchayat, Baramkela Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Baramkela, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Mr. Roop Naik, Advocate For Respondent/ State :
Ms. Akanksha Jain, Dy. G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 03.12.2019 Heard.
1. The limited relief sought for by the petitioner in this petition is for an appropriate direction to the respondents for releasing the arrears of pay which the petitioner is entitled for on account of revision of pay granted to the petitioner.
2. According to counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner was entitled for an amount of Rs.37,510/- as arrears of pay which till date has not been
released. The petitioner has been approaching the authorities in the department, but till date no steps have been taken by the authorities concerned.
3. Given the said facts and circumstances of the case, this court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents No.2 to 4 to take appropriate decision so far as arrears of pay that the petitioner is entitled for on account of revision of pay that is taken place, at the earliest, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
4. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to apprise the respondents No.2 to 4 so far as order passed by this court is concerned.
5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Yasmin