High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/10364/2019disposed off

Naarad Prasad v. South East Coalfields Limited,

2019-12-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 10364 of 2019 • Naarad Prasad S/o Late Brijlal Aged About 40 Years Present Working Category - 3 / Haulage Operation, Churcha Mine R. O. ( West Block ) R/o Village Churcha Colliery, Police - Station - Churcha, District Koria, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. South East Coalfields Limited, Through - Its Managing Director , Seepat Road, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

2. Chief General Manager, South East Coalfield Limited, Baikunthpur Area, Baikunthpur, District Korea Chhattisgarh

3. Sub Area Manager, Churcha Sub Area, South East Coalfield Limited, Churcha Colliery, Police - Station - Churcha, District Koria, Chhattisgarh

4. Personnel Manager, Churcha Sub Area, South East Coalfield Limited, Churcha Colliery, Police - Station - Churcha, District Koria, Chhattisgarh

5. Mines Manager, Churcha R. O. South East Coalfield Limited , Churcha Colliery, Police - Station - Churcha, District Koria, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Mahendra Dubey, Advocate For Respondents/SECL :

Shri H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Adv. With Ms. Preeti Yadav, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 12/12/2019

1. The short grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the Haulage Operator in the SECL. A criminal case was registered against the petitioner on 03.07.2019, however, subsequently, he was bailed out on 09.09.2019. Thereafter, he went to report back to the department to join his duties on

16.09.2019, his joining was not accepted and it was rejected.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the SECL may be directed to take a decision on the request of the petitioner and the application of the petitioner for joining as it is contended that till date the petitioner is neither been suspended nor any notice has been served may be directed to be decided.

3. Learned counsel for the SECL would submit that if the application has been given by the petitioner, it will be decided.

4. Considering the fact at this stage no issue falls for consideration except the fact that the petitioner if he has given the application for joining that may be considered and decided by the SECL in accordance with law.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu