Lokesh Ranjan Jain v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 10577 of 2019

1. Lokesh Ranjan Jain S/o Mr. Shanker Lal Jain Aged About 35 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher ( Local Body ), Posted At Government Primary School, Bandhapara, Bagodar, Block Kanker District U.B. Kanker Chhattisgarh

2. Kamlesh Kumar Ramteke, S/o Late Mr. Murari Ramteke, Aged About 34 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher ( Local Body ), Posted At Government Primary School, Nayapara, Bagodar, Block Kanker District U.B. Kanker Chhattisgarh

3. Ashok Kumar Netam S/o Mr. Budhram Netam Aged About 34 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher ( Local Body ), Posted At Government Primary School Bagodar , Block Kanker District U.B. Kanker Chhattisgarh

4. Sanjay Kumar Sahu S/o Mr. Gopal Ram Sahu, Aged About 43 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher ( Local Body ), Posted At Government, Primary School Andi, Khaspara, Block Kanker District U.B. Kanker Chhattisgarh

5. Mrs. Triveni Jain W/o Mr. Santosh Jain Aged About 40 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher ( Local Body ), Posted At Government Primary School, Sarangpal, Block Kanker District U.B. Kanker Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department , Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer, District Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat District U.B. Kanker Chhattisgarh

5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kanker, District U.B. Kanker Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate For Respondent/ State :

Ms. Beenu Sharma, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board

13/12/2019 1.

Challenge in this petition is that though the petitioners were initially appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III and have subsequently been absorbed to the Education Department, they have by now completed 10 years of service and therefore they are entitled for the benefit of Karmonnati as per rules governing the field, however, the respondents till date have not granted the said benefit to the petitioners. 2.

Given the limited grievance which the petitioners have raised, let the petitioners make a suitable representation to the respondents No.3 & 4 within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the respondents No.3 & 4, in turn, shall take a decision on the granting of Kramonnati to the petitioners within a further period of 90 days.

3.

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Yasmin