Jainti v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 10465 of 2019
1. Jainti S/o Durwasa Kumar Aged About 45 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Boys Higher Secondary School, Mohala, Block Mohala, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
2. Anil Kumar Pisda, S/o Shatru Ram Pisda, Aged About 36 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bharritola, Block Manpur, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
3. Tijlal Pathare, S/o Surit Ram Pathare, Aged About 46 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Boys Higher Secondary School, Bharritola, Block Manpur, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
4. Akhil Kumar Patel, S/o Jiwrakhan Lal Patel, Aged About 49 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Kumarda, Block Chhuriya District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
5. Suresh Kumar Rawte, S/o Dashi Ram Rawte, Aged About 35 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Salhe, Block Chhuriya District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
6. Smt. Bharti Yadav, W/o Basant Kumar Yadav, Aged About 40 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Kumarda, Block Chhuriya District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
7. Balwant Kumar Mandavi, S/o Bajaru Ram Mandavi, Aged About 43 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bhawasa, Block Manpur District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
8. Bhesh Ram Rawte, S/o Dhursin Rawte, Aged About 50 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bharritola, Block Manpur, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
9. Varoon Kumar Latiya, S/o Late Ram Latiya, Aged About 46 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bhawasa, Block Manpur, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.
10.Dukalu Ram Rawate, S/o Shyam Lal Rawate, Aged About 43 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Boys Higher Secondary School, Mohala, Block Mohala, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
11. Smt. Seema Verma, D/o Sukhdev Prasad Banchhore, Aged About 47 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Boys Higher Secondary School, Mohala, Block Mohala, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 12.Navin Kumar Singh, S/o Ram Sajivan Singh Aged About 40 Years Working As
Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Boys Higher Secondary School, Mohala, Block Mohala, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
13. Chandrakanti Pradhan, W/o Prasanna Kumar Pradhan, Aged About 37 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. Middle School, Itar, Block Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 14.Nalini Verma, W/o Kapil Singh Verma, Aged About 43 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At District Institute Of Education And Training Centre (DIET) Khairagarh, Block Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 15.Anurag Yadav, S/o Surendra Nath Yadav, Aged About 44 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Govt. High School Singhabhedi Block Ambagarh Chowki, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. Director, Directorate Of Chhattisgarh Public Instruction, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh,
3. District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, ---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents/State :
Ms. Richa Shukla, Dy. GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 11/12/2019
1. Heard.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in WPS No.812 of 2019, therefore, the same order may be passed in the present
writ petition also.
3. This Court in WPS No.812 of 2019 on 07.02.2019 has passed the following order:- "1. The limited grievance of the petitioners is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.
2. Given the limited grievance raised, let both the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.
3. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of."
4. Learned State counsel do not dispute the fact brought to the notice of the Court by the petitioner.
5. It is ordered accordingly. The ratio laid down in the case supra shall also govern the cause of lis in this case and will have the same effect and operation. With such observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu