← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/4479/2019disposed off

Pravin Kumar Kesharwani v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-01-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4479 of 2019 Pravin Kumar Kesharwani S/o Jairam Kesharwani Aged About 50 Years R/o Bus Stand Parisar, Ward No. 4, Sarangarh, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of General Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

3. The Chief Municipal Officer Nagar Panchayat Sarangarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

4. The S.D.O. (Revenue) Sarangarh District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

5. Kuldeep Singh Ahuja S/o Late Ratan Singh Ahuja Aged About 50 Years R/o Ward No. 03, Sarangarh, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

6. Dilip Kumar S/o Dayaram Agrawal Aged About 52 Years R/o Ward No. 04, Sarangarh, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioners : Shri Tarun Dansena, Adv.

For State : Shri V.R. Tiwari, Addl. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 29.01.2020

1. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is for the illegal allotment of Shop No. 1 in the development office of Nagar Panchayat Sarangarh Distt. Raigarh.

2. According to the counsel for the Petitioner, the respondents No. 5 in fact had not participated in the auction proceedings yet he had been alloted the said shop . He further submits that petitioner has already preferred an objection / representation to the respondent No. 3 but the same till date has not been considered/ decided.

-23. Given the said facts, the respondent No. 3 shall take a decision on the representation/ objection that the petitioner has made in respect of allotment of shop to the respondent No. 5. Let a decision be taken at the earliest preferably within a period of 90 days.

4. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha