← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/8109/2019allowed

Ishwar Verma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-02-03Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 8109 of 2019 • Ishwar Verma S/o Bisouna Verma Aged About 23 Years (Wrongly Written As Bisauha In Cause Title Of Certified Copy Of Order Dated 15-11-2019), R/o Ward No. 3, Kewat Para, Village Arjuni, Post Balsamund, Police Station Bemetara, Tahsil And District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh.

---- Applicant

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Police Station Bemetara, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent For Applicant.

:

Mr. Aditya Singh Rajput, Advocate.

For Respondent/State :

Mr. Vaibhav K. Agrawal, PL Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 03.02.2020

1. The accused/applicant has moved this first bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for releasing him on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No. 463/2019 registered at Police Station Bemetara, District Bemetara (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376 of IPC and Sections 6 & 12 of POCSO Act.

2. The prosecution story in brief is that, a missing report of the prosecutrix was lodged before the concerned police station. After completion of investigation, prosecutrix was recovered from the possession of applicant. The allegation against the present applicant is that he has abducted the prosecutrix. Based on that offence has been registered against the applicant and he has been arrested.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. He next submits that prosecutrix is above 17 years old, applicant has not abducted the prosecutrix, she herself went to the house of applicant and she was a consenting party. Chargesheet has been filed and he is in jail since 23.09.2019 and he is ready to furnish adequate surety and shall abide by all the conditions and directions, which may be imposed by this court, therefore, the present applicant may be released on bail.

4. Per contra, State counsel opposes the bail application.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

6. Taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence, facts and circumstances of the case, age of the prosecutrix and further considering that the applicant is in jail since 23.09.2019 and the trial is likely to take some time for its final disposal, this Court is of the view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the application is allowed.

7. Accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear before the said Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court.

Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge Vijay Sahu