← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCRMP/2758/2019rejected

State Of Chhattisgarh v. Belsajar @ Bilu

2021-03-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 2758 of 2019 • State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

• Belsajar @ Bilu S/o Late Jaiman Khess Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Bada Galounda, Police Station Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent • Mr. K.K. Singh, GA for the State.

D.B.: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor Order on Board Per Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.

02.03.2021 Heard on IA No. 1 application for condonation of delay in filing of application as also on prayer for grant of leave to appeal. Even if we are inclined to condone the delay, we do not find any merit in the application for the reason that the acquittal of the accused is founded on a minute scrutiny of the evidence led by the prosecution that the prosecution failed to prove any of the incriminating circumstantial evidence either of last seen or even of recovery of blood stains articles at the instance of the accused. The independent witnesses of memorandum and seizure PW-6 and PW-9 both have turned hostile and not supported the case of the prosecution.

The motive as alleged that at the time of Vishwakarma Pooja the respondent/accused had threatened to kill the deceased is of about six months before the date of alleged incident without there being any other incident of threat or assault in near proximity. There is no report of presence of applicant at or near the spot where the death body was found.

benefit of which should go to the accused. The view taken by learned trial Court is plausible and possible one and does not warrant any interference by this Court against the same. Given the limited scope of interference against the judgment of acquittal, we do consider present to be a fit case for grant of leave to appeal.

Accordingly, application is rejected.

Sd/- Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) (Vimla Singh Kapoor) Judge Judge Pawan