Ghanshyam Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 10439 of 2019 • Ghanshyam Sahu S/o Itwari Ram Sahu Aged About 49 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher ( L.B.) , Government Higher Secondary School Mudagoan Block Chhura, District - Gariyaband Chhattisgarh. R/o Village Ranipartewa, Tahsil Chhura, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2.

Secretary Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3.

District Education Officer Gariyaband, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh 4.

Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Gariyaband, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh 5.

Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Chhura, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh 6.

Principal, Government Higher Secondary School Mudagoan Block Chhura, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Ghanshyam Kashyap, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Ms. Richa Shukla, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 11/12/2019

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in WPS No.812 of 2019, therefore, the same order may be passed in the present writ petition also.

3. This Court in WPS No.812 of 2019 on 07.02.2019 has passed the following

order:- "1.The limited grievance of the petitioners is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed, but they have not been given the same till date.

2. Given the limited grievance raised, let both the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.

3.With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of."

4. Learned State counsel has no objection.

5. It is ordered accordingly. The ratio laid down in the case supra shall also govern the cause of lis in this case and will have the same effect and operation.

6. With such observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge yasmin