← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/10493/2019disposed off

Bhikham Matwale v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-12-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 10493 of 2019 1.

Bhikham Matwale S/o Budhe Lal Matwale Aged About 43 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Government Primary School Lohjhar Block Chhura, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh, R/o Village Amethi, Tahsil Chhura, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh 2.

Kanaklata Mandale W/o Ramratan Mandale Aged About 42 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Government Primary School Boirgoan, Block Chhura, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh, R/o Village Khadma, Tahsil Chhura, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh 3.

Nohar Soni S/o Radheshyam Soni Aged About 47 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Government Primary School Chatarmadai, Block Chhura, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh, R/o Village Chhura, Tahsil Chhura, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh 4.

Mamta Rajput W/o Santosh Thakur Aged About 46 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Government Primary School Kharsara, Block Chhura, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh, R/o Village Rajim, Tahsil Fingeshwar, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh 5.

Anand Ram Chakradhari S/o Premlal Chakradhari Aged About 41 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Government Kanya Ashram School Dadargoan (Naya), Block Chhura, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh, R/o Village Panduka, Tahsil Chhura, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh 6.

Gopal Ram Sonwani S/o Mukuram Sonwani Aged About 52 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Government Primary School Bharwamuda, Block Chhura, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh, R/o Village Kutena, Tahsil Fingeshwar, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh 7.

Kusma Netam W/o Ashwan Netam Aged About 39 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Government Kanya Ashram School Dadargoan (Naya), Block Chhura, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh, R/o Village Dadargoan (Naya), Tahsil Chhura, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2.

Secretary Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3.

District Education Officer Gariyaband, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh 4.

Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Gariyaband, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh 5.

Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Chhura, District Gariyaband,

Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh 6.

Block Education Officer Chhura, District Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Ghanshyam Kashyap, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Ms. Richa Shukla, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 12/12/2019

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in WPS No.812 of 2019, therefore, the same order may be passed in the present writ petition also.

3. This Court in WPS No.812 of 2019 on 07.02.2019 has passed the following order:- "1.The limited grievance of the petitioner is that he is entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which he has completed, but he has not been given the same till date.

2. Given the limited grievance raised, let the petitioner make detailed representation in this regard to respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioner.

3.With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of."

4. Learned State counsel has no objection.

5. It is ordered accordingly. The ratio laid down in the case supra shall also govern the cause of lis in this case and will have the same effect and

operation.

6. With such observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge yasmin