Omprakash v. Unio Of India

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 4601 of 2019

1. Omprakash S/o Shri Ghanshyam Aged About 27 Years Village Sahda, Poste Bhawanipur, Tahsil Palari, P. S. Gidhpuri, District Baloda BazarBhatapara Chhattisgarh Pin 493229, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

2. Lokesh Kumar Sahu S/o Hariram Sahu Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Jaroud, Post Office Farfaud, Tahsil And P. S. Arang District Raipur Chhattisgarh Pin 493441, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Skill Development Enterpreurship, Government Of India, New Delhi, District : New Delhi, Delhi

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Technical Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Director General Of Training Ministry Of Skill Development Entrepreneurship, Government Of India, Employment Exchange Building Library Avenue, Pusa Campus New Delhi, District : New Delhi, Delhi

4. Secretary State Board Of Examination Directorate Employment And Training, Chhattisgarh Pariksha Prakoshth Industrial Training Institute, Saddu Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Superintendent Industrial Training Institute, Arang, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Saleem Kazi, Advocate For Union of India :

Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 16.12.2019

1. The limited relief sought by the petitioners in the present writ petition is for an appropriate direction to the respondents 3 & 4 for issuance of the Original National Trade Certificate.

2. According to the counsel for the petitioners, they had participated in the programme of all India Trade Test of Craftsmen under CTS for Engineering and Non-Engineering trades under the respondent no.4 during the period 2012-2014. The petitioners had successfully completed the said course and they were also issued with a provisional certificate vide Annexure P-4 dated 8th December, 2014. However, thereafter in spite of repeated request being made the respondent no.3 has not issued the Original National Trade Certificate which the petitioners now badly need for recruitment process. 3.

Given the fact that the petitioners had undergone training about 4-5 years back and they had also got a provisional certificate issued about 4-5 years back and also considering the urgent need of the

same for the petitioners for their employment purpose, this Court is of the opinion that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending rather ends of justice would meet if the respondents 3 & 4, as the case may be, are directed to immediately process the claim of the petitioners for grant of National Trade Certificate and issue the same to the petitioners within an outer limit of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this Order.

4. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioners to apprise the respondents 3 & 4 for taking necessary steps pursuant to the order passed by this Court.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Rohit