High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/10681/2019disposed off

Trilok Kumar Dubey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-12-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 10681 of 2019 • Trilok Kumar Dubey S/o Late Shri Khedu Prasad Dubey Aged About 49 Years R/o Near Bus Stand Bilaigarh, Police Station And Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh, Working As Assistant Teacher Panchayat (L.B.E.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh Directorate, Through Director, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh

4. Block Education Officer Block Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar, Bhatapara Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Gary Mukhopadhyay, Advocate For Respondent/ State :

Ms. Richa Shukla, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 17/12/2019

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled for Kramonnati as per circulars dated 19.04.1999, 28.04.2008, 03.10.2008 and 11.01.2010 after completion of 10 years of service. He submits that the issue involved in the present petition has already

been considered and decided by this Court in the matter of R.S. Verma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others (W.P.(S) No.2805/2002 by judgment and order dated 29.08.2006. He further submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation to consider the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of State of Tripura and Others Vs. K.K. Roy (2004 SCW/1) and the order passed in R.S. Verma (supra) top which learned counsel for the respondent/State has no objection.

3. Accordingly, the liberty sought for by the petitioner is granted to make a representation before the concerned authority. It is expected from the competent authority subject to verification decide the representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible in an objective manner preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. In view of above, the petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Yasmin