Toman Kumar Sahu v. Union Of India

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.4622 of 2019

1. Toman Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Ramuram Sahu Aged About 30 Years R/o Village And Post Karelibadi, Tahsil Magarlod, Police Station Gidhpuri, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

2. Tarun Kumar Sahu S/o Daultram Sahu Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Bijnapuri Post Chhati, Tahsil And District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, Pin 493663.

---Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. Union of India Through The Secretary Ministry of Skill Development And Entrepreneurship, Government of India, New Delhi.

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Technical Education, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Director General of Training Ministry of Skill Development And Entrepreneurship, Government Of India, Employment Exchange Building, Library Avenue, Pusa Campus, New Delhi.

4. Secretary State Board of Examination, Directorate Employment And Training, Chhattisgarh, Industrial Training Institute, Saddu, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

5. Superintendent Industrial Training Institute, Kurud, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Faiz Kazi, Advocate.

For Respondent 1 :

Shri RK Gupta, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Anshuman Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 17.12.2019

1. The limited relief sought by the petitioners in the present writ petition is for an appropriate direction to the respondents 3 & 4 for issuance of the Original National Trade Certificate.

2. According to the counsel for the petitioners, they had participated in the programme of all India Trade Test of Craftsmen under CTS for Engineering and Non-Engineering trades under the respondent no.4 during the period 2011-2013. The petitioners had successfully completed the said course and they were also issued with a provisional certificate vide Annexure P-3 dated 31.10.2013 and 12.05.2014. However, thereafter in spite of repeated request being made the respondent no.3 has not issued the

-2Original National Trade Certificate which the petitioners now badly need for recruitment process.

3. Given the fact that the petitioners had undergone training about 4-5 years back and they had also got a provisional certificate issued about 4-5 years back and also considering the urgent need of the same for the petitioners for their employment purpose, this Court is of the opinion that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending rather ends of justice would meet if the respondents 3 & 4, as the case may be, are directed to immediately process the claim of the petitioners for grant of National Trade Certificate and issue the same to the petitioners within an outer limit of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this Order.

4. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioners to apprise the respondents 3 & 4 for taking necessary steps pursuant to the order passed by this Court.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed-off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder