← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/10595/2019disposed off

Ramsingh Kumeti v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-12-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 10595 of 2019 • Ramsingh Kumeti S/o Shri Bajaru Ram Kumeti Aged About 48 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher L.B. Primary School Malaj Kutum R/o Village Malaj Kutum , Block Kanker District Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary School Education Department , Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan , Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh 2.

Secretary Panchayat Gramin Development And Labour Department , Mantralaya Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh 3.

Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Kanker , District Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh 4.

District Education Officer Kanker District Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Mr. Neeraj Pradhan, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 13/12/2019

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in WPS No.4420 of 2019, therefore, the same order may be passed in the present writ petition also.

3. This Court in WPS No.4420 of 2019 on 21.06.2019 has passed the following order:- "1.The limited grievance of the petitioner is that he is entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which he has completed, but he has not been given the same till date.

2. Given the limited grievance raised, let the petitioner make detailed representation in this regard to respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioner.

3.With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of."

4. Learned State counsel has no objection.

5. It is ordered accordingly. The ratio laid down in the case supra shall also govern the cause of lis in this case and will have the same effect and operation.

6. With such observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge yasmin